Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the creation of a usufructuary mortgage of zamindari property amounts to a loss of or parting with proprietary rights so as to confer an ex-proprietary or occupancy tenancy in the sir-land under Section 7 of the Rent Act, Act XII of 1881.
Analysis: The majority treated a usufructuary mortgage as effecting a transfer of the incidents of ownership, at least to the extent of exclusive possession and enjoyment of usufruct, and therefore regarded it as a parting with proprietary rights within the meaning of Section 7. On that view, the statutory protection of ex-proprietary tenancy was intended to apply where the proprietor had ceased, even temporarily, to retain the full proprietary character contemplated by the section. The dissenting members held that a usufructuary mortgage is only a limited security transaction, not an absolute divestiture of proprietary rights, and that the statutory words "lose or part with" require a complete and permanent alienation of ownership.
Conclusion: The majority answered the question in the affirmative and held that a usufructuary mortgage can make the mortgagor an ex-proprietary tenant under Section 7.
Final Conclusion: The decision establishes that, for the purposes of the Rent Act, a usufructuary mortgage may amount to parting with proprietary rights and attract the statutory right of occupancy in sir-land.
Concurring Opinion: The majority opinion of Petheram, C.J., Douglas Straight and Syed Mahmood, J.J. held that the mortgage transaction divested the mortgagor of the proprietary incidents necessary to fall within Section 7. Dissenting Opinion: Oldfield and Brodhurst, J.J. held that a usufructuary mortgage does not amount to a complete loss or parting with proprietary rights and does not create ex-proprietary tenancy.
Ratio Decidendi: A usufructuary mortgage that transfers possession and the right to enjoy the usufruct can constitute a statutory parting with proprietary rights for the purpose of ex-proprietary tenancy under the Rent Act.