Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an official liquidator, with sanction of the Court, can refer a dispute of the company in liquidation to private arbitration.
Analysis: The power of an official liquidator under section 179 of the Companies Act, 1913, to institute or defend legal proceedings and to do other acts necessary for winding up was held not to include a power to refer disputes to private arbitration. Section 152 of the same Act, which permits a company to refer matters to arbitration, was treated as confined to arbitration under the Indian Arbitration Act and not as authority for an official liquidator. The absence of any express power of reference to arbitration, contrasted with the express power to compromise claims under section 234, indicated that the legislature did not intend such a power to exist. The principle that disputes under section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, are not fit subject-matter for private arbitration was also considered applicable.
Conclusion: The application for permission to refer the dispute to private arbitration was refused.
Ratio Decidendi: An official liquidator has no implied authority, even with the Court's sanction, to refer a company dispute to private arbitration unless the statute expressly confers that power.