Maintenance rights of widowed daughter-in-law can attach to inherited self-acquired property as an enforceable legal charge.

A widowed daughter-in-law could claim maintenance from her father-in-law's self-acquired property after it devolved on the surviving son by inheritance. The property was not treated as ancestral merely because it passed to the son, but Hindu law recognised a moral obligation on the father-in-law to maintain the widow, and that obligation was held to attach to the estate in the son's hands. The son's inheritance was therefore subject to a legally enforceable charge in favour of the widow. The appeal succeeded on this legal question, the dismissal below was set aside, and the matter was remitted for decision on the remaining issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a widowed daughter-in-law can claim maintenance out of the self-acquired property of her father-in-law when that property has devolved by inheritance on his surviving son. (ii) Whether the father's moral obligation to maintain the widow becomes a legally enforceable charge against the inherited property in the hands of the son.

Issue (i): Whether a widowed daughter-in-law can claim maintenance out of the self-acquired property of her father-in-law when that property has devolved by inheritance on his surviving son.

Analysis: The property was found to be self-acquired property of the father-in-law. The reasoning rejected the contention that, as regards the widow, such property must be treated as ancestral property merely because it passed to the son by inheritance. It was held that the widow had no vested interest in the property during her husband's lifetime, but the Hindu law recognized a moral obligation on the father-in-law to provide for her maintenance, and that this obligation could operate upon the estate in the hands of the son who inherited it.

Conclusion: Yes. The widow was entitled to claim maintenance out of the self-acquired property inherited by the son.

Issue (ii): Whether the father's moral obligation to maintain the widow becomes a legally enforceable charge against the inherited property in the hands of the son.

Analysis: The decision proceeded on the basis that Hindu law connects inheritance with spiritual benefit and recognizes that property inherited from an ancestor is taken subject to obligations the ancestor was morally bound to discharge. On that footing, the son's inheritance was treated as carrying forward the father's moral duty to maintain the widow, converting it into a legal obligation enforceable against the son and the property in his hands.

Conclusion: Yes. The moral obligation matured into a legal charge enforceable against the son and the inherited property.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the question of law, the dismissal below was set aside, and the matter was sent back for decision on the remaining issues.

---