Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. Here it shows just a few of many results. To view list of all cases mentioning this section, Visit here

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>High Court clarifies CPC Section 15 application in original jurisdiction, allows transfer of suits below Rs.10,000 to City Civil Court.</h1> The High Court of Madras held that Section 15, CPC, does not apply to the High Court exercising original jurisdiction. Suits valued below Rs. 10,000 ... - Issues Involved:1. Applicability of Section 15, Civil Procedure Code (CPC) to Chartered High Courts.2. Competence of the City Civil Court to try suits filed in the High Court below Rs. 10,000 in value prior to the enhancement of its jurisdiction.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Applicability of Section 15, Civil Procedure Code (CPC) to Chartered High Courts:The first question addressed whether Section 15, CPC, which mandates that every suit should be instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it, applies to Chartered High Courts. The High Court of Madras has unlimited original jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, except for cases within the jurisdiction of the Small Cause Court at Madras where the debt or damage does not exceed Rs. 100. The City Civil Court Act (VII of 1892) established the City Civil Court with jurisdiction over suits not exceeding Rs. 2,500, later increased to Rs. 10,000 by a notification effective from 1st December 1948.The judgment emphasized that Section 15, CPC, lays down a rule of procedure, not of jurisdiction, and does not oust the jurisdiction of a higher-grade court even if a suit could have been instituted in a lower-grade court. The practice has been that Section 15 does not apply to the original jurisdiction of the High Court, and the proviso (1) to Section 16 of the City Civil Court Act, which imposes a penalty on the plaintiff for instituting a suit in the High Court that should have been filed in the City Civil Court, is inconsistent with Section 15, CPC.The conclusion was that Section 15, CPC, does not apply to the High Court exercising original jurisdiction when there is a conflict between the High Court and the City Civil Court. Therefore, the answer to the first question was in the negative.2. Competence of the City Civil Court to try suits filed in the High Court below Rs. 10,000 in value prior to the enhancement of its jurisdiction:The second question addressed whether the City Civil Court could try suits filed in the High Court below Rs. 10,000 in value before the jurisdictional enhancement. The judgment noted that the power of transfer under Section 16, proviso (2), of the City Civil Court Act, allows the High Court to transfer suits to the City Civil Court if, at the time of transfer, the suit is within the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court. The expression 'arising within the City of Madras' in Section 3A and the notification was interpreted to denote the class of suits, not the time of their institution.The judgment emphasized that a suitor's right to have a suit tried in a particular court is subject to the power of transfer recognized in the statute. The vested right to continue an action in the court where it was instituted can be made subject to a power of transfer by the very Act that constituted and established the court. The High Court has the power to transfer suits to the City Civil Court under the second proviso to Section 16, even if the suits were instituted before the jurisdictional enhancement.The conclusion was that suits instituted before 1st December 1948, and valued below Rs. 10,000, can be transferred to the City Civil Court, and the City Civil Court is competent to try such suits when transferred. The transfer of suits can legally be made either under Section 16, proviso (2), of the City Civil Court Act or under Section 24(1), CPC.Separate Judgments:Subba Rao, J., expressed agreement with the conclusions without adding a separate judgment. Viswanatha Sastri, J., provided a detailed analysis, concurring with the conclusions and emphasizing the legislative intent and statutory provisions supporting the power of transfer and the non-applicability of Section 15, CPC, to the original jurisdiction of the High Court.Conclusion:The High Court of Madras held that Section 15, CPC, does not apply to the High Court exercising original jurisdiction, and suits valued below Rs. 10,000 instituted before the jurisdictional enhancement can be transferred to the City Civil Court, which is competent to try them. The transfer can be made under Section 16, proviso (2), of the City Civil Court Act or Section 24(1), CPC.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found