Circumstantial evidence and acquittal: unreliable confessions and weak identification barred interference in a murder appeal.

In a murder prosecution based on circumstantial evidence, the SC found that the identity of the deceased, proof of homicidal death, and the incriminating links were not established with dependable evidence. The alleged recovery of bodies was not satisfactorily linked to the victims, the medical evidence did not show homicidal death, and the extra-judicial confessions were treated as improbable and unreliable. The purported last-seen evidence was also weak and uncertain. Applying the rule that an appellate court interferes with an acquittal only where the High Court's appraisal is vitiated by a manifest infirmity, the Court declined interference and upheld the acquittal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the acquittal recorded by the High Court in a murder case based solely on circumstantial evidence required interference, in view of the alleged recovery of dead bodies, extra judicial confessions, and supporting conduct evidence.

Analysis: The prosecution evidence did not satisfactorily establish that the recovered dead bodies were those of the alleged victims, and the medical evidence did not show homicidal death because the bodies were decomposed and no ligature marks were found. The extra judicial confessions were found improbable and lacked credibility, particularly because the alleged confessing accused had no convincing reason to make such disclosures to the witnesses named. The evidence of the witness said to have seen one accused taking a deceased person on a cycle was also weak, uncertain, and insufficiently reliable. In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only where the High Court's appraisal of evidence is vitiated by a glaring infirmity, and no such infirmity was shown.

Conclusion: The acquittal was not liable to be disturbed, and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: In a case resting on circumstantial evidence, an accused cannot be convicted unless identity of the deceased, homicidal death, and the incriminating circumstances are proved with dependable evidence, and an appellate court will not interfere with an acquittal absent a manifest error in the appreciation of evidence.

---