TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether there was material for the Tribunal to find that the assessee continued to carry on the silver business after the partition of 7 June 1943; (ii) Whether the cost price or the market value of the silver on the date of partition should be taken into account in determining the profit on subsequent sales.
Issue (i): Whether there was material for the Tribunal to conclude that the assessee carried on the silver business after partition.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the Hindu undivided family carried on a purchase and sale business in silver and that the silver constituted stock in trade. The assessee treated the silver received on partition in the same manner as it had been treated by the family, debiting it as balance b/f at the same cost valuation. The subsequent disposals were effected in multiple transactions through brokers to different purchasers rather than by a single conversion sale, consistent with dealing in stock in trade. There was no complete break in ownership or in the manner of dealing with the asset; the family business was composed of individuals including the assessee and partition resulted in exclusive possession by the assessee without rebutting the presumption of continuity.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had material to find that the assessee continued to carry on the silver business after partition; answer in the affirmative and against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the cost price or the market value on the date of partition should be taken for determining profit on sale of the silver.
Analysis: Given the finding of continuity of the silver business in the hands of the assessee, the stock received on partition was treated in the same class as the donor's stock and was valued and entered at cost in the assessee's books. Authorities relied upon by the assessee involved conversion of assets from one class to another (investment converted into stock in trade or a discontinuity leading to revaluation) and therefore are inapplicable where there is continuity of business and similar treatment of the asset by the receiver. Where the asset continues to be stock in trade, valuation at the existing cost as carried in the books is appropriate.
Conclusion: The cost price of Rs. 27,710 is to be taken into account in determining the profit; market value on the date of partition is not payable for this purpose.
Final Conclusion: The Court answered the referred questions by affirming that (i) there was material to hold that the assessee continued the silver business after partition and (ii) the cost price as recorded should be used to compute profit; consequently the departmental assessment treating the surplus as business profit is supported and the reference is returned to the Tribunal with these answers.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a transferee receives stock in trade on partition and continues the same business with the same class treatment of the asset, the opening stock is to be valued at the cost recorded in the books and profits on subsequent sales are computed against that cost rather than against market value at the date of partition.
TaxTMI 
