Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Corporation could proceed against the guarantors' mortgaged properties under Section 29 of the Orissa State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 without first exhausting remedies against the principal debtor.
Analysis: The liability of a surety under Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless the contract provides otherwise. On the authorities considered, a creditor is not bound to exhaust remedies against the principal debtor before proceeding against the surety. The guarantee deeds in question made the guarantors liable for the whole amount due on default and did not exclude the ordinary operation of Section 128. The statutory power under Section 29 of the Orissa State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 could therefore be invoked against the mortgaged properties of the guarantors.
Conclusion: The Corporation was entitled to proceed against the guarantors and their mortgaged properties without first proceeding against the principal debtor; the challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a contractual stipulation to the contrary, a surety's liability is immediate and co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, and the creditor may proceed directly against the surety without first exhausting remedies against the principal debtor.