1975 (12) TMI 188 - SC - Indian Laws

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal Over Doubt

The State of Bihar appealed the acquittal of seven appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, who had doubts about the prosecution's case. The Patna ... - Issues:1. Acquittal by Additional Sessions Judge and subsequent appeal by State of Bihar.2. Occurrence leading to the death of two individuals and the ill-feeling between the parties.3. Prosecution version of the incident and evidence presented.4. Evaluation of evidence by Additional Sessions Judge leading to the acquittal of all accused.5. Reappraisal of evidence by the High Court and the decision to convict seven appellants.6. Legal principles regarding appeals against acquittals and the decision of the Supreme Court.Issue 1: Acquittal by Additional Sessions Judge and Subsequent Appeal by State of BiharThe Additional Sessions Judge at Chapra acquitted all accused due to doubts regarding the prosecution's case. The State of Bihar appealed, leading to the Patna High Court affirming the acquittal of nine accused but setting it aside for the seven appellants. The seven were convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced accordingly.Issue 2: Occurrence Leading to Deaths and Ill-Feeling Between PartiesThe incident occurred in a village over a land dispute, resulting in the deaths of two individuals. The ill-feeling between the parties stemmed from a history of disputes over land possession, electoral rivalries, and previous legal proceedings concerning the land in question.Issue 3: Prosecution Version of Incident and Evidence PresentedThe prosecution alleged that the accused, armed and in a group, attacked the victims while they were harvesting paddy. Witness testimonies and medical evidence were presented to support the prosecution's case, including statements made by the victims before their deaths and the injuries sustained by them.Issue 4: Evaluation of Evidence by Additional Sessions JudgeThe Additional Sessions Judge raised doubts about the prosecution's case, citing inconsistencies in witness statements, lack of mention of crucial details in initial statements, and discrepancies in the sequence of events. The judge found various circumstances, including injuries to accused persons and absence of expected evidence at the crime scene, that cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative.Issue 5: Reappraisal of Evidence by High CourtThe High Court reevaluated the evidence and found sufficient material to convict the seven appellants. The High Court's decision was based on a different interpretation of the evidence compared to the Additional Sessions Judge. However, the Supreme Court held that the trial court's view was not unreasonable, leading to the reversal of the High Court's judgment and restoration of the acquittal.Issue 6: Legal Principles Regarding Appeals Against AcquittalsThe Supreme Court emphasized the principle that if two conclusions can be drawn from the evidence, the court should not disturb the trial court's acquittal. As the trial court's view was deemed reasonable, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, setting aside the convictions and directing the appellants to be released immediately.