High Court upholds assessee's gifts, orders interest payment & costs. Judges concur on decision.

The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the gifts made on March 28, 1957, and directing the allowance of interest claimed. The court ordered the Revenue to pay the costs of the reference, with both judges concurring on the decision.

---

---

Issues: Validity of gift for interest deduction

Analysis:
The case involves a reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, regarding the validity of a gift made to Bai Kamala and Bai Indu on March 28, 1957, for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59. The assessee claimed deduction for interest paid to the donees based on the credits made to their accounts on the said date. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and Gift Tax Officer (GTO) contended that the gifts were made on different dates, leading to the denial of interest deduction for the relevant assessment years.

The assessee appealed against the ITO's decision to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), who upheld the view that the gifts were made on the later dates specified by the ITO. However, the Tribunal, in a consolidated order with a gift-tax appeal, found that the gifts were validly made on March 28, 1957. The Tribunal highlighted that the gifts were executed before a notary public, and the donees agreed to keep the amount in deposit in the family firm's business at an annual interest rate of 3 percent.

The matter was further analyzed in reference before the High Court, where the court referred to a previous decision supporting the validity of the gifts. The court emphasized that since the gifts were established, the interest paid to the donees, which was utilized in the business of the assessee-firm, should be allowed as a business expenditure. The court also distinguished the case from a Supreme Court decision regarding money in a business context, stating that it was not relevant to the present controversy.

Ultimately, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the gifts made on March 28, 1957, and directing the allowance of interest claimed. The court ordered the Revenue to pay the costs of the reference, with both judges concurring on the decision.

---