Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings for alleged contravention of the packaged commodities rules could be initiated against watches in the absence of a notification under Section 1(3)(d) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 bringing such goods within the Act.
Analysis: The Act applies to areas, classes of undertakings, classes of goods, and classes of users only when the Central Government issues the requisite notification. The scheme of Section 1(3) shows that mere applicability of the Act in general does not automatically extend to every commodity. In the absence of a specific notification covering watches, the authorities lacked the statutory basis to invoke the Act and Rules against the petitioner. The alleged contravention and the consequential proceedings could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The proceedings were without jurisdiction and were quashed, with relief granted in favour of the petitioner.