Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bagasse arising in the manufacture of sugar and molasses is a final product or by-product so as to attract Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether duty could be demanded on the ground of common inputs used in the manufacturing process.
Analysis: Bagasse was found to be neither a final product nor a by-product of the sugar and molasses manufacture, but waste and residue classifiable under Heading 23.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to nil rate duty. On that footing, Rule 57CC, which applies where common inputs are used in exempted and dutiable final products and separate accounts are not maintained, was held inapplicable. The reasoning followed the earlier view that no demand could be sustained under Rule 57CC when bagasse itself is not a final product of the assessee's industry.
Conclusion: The demand under Rule 57CC was not sustainable and the Revenue appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The orders in appeal were upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 57CC does not apply where the goods in question are only waste or residue and not final or exempted products manufactured with common inputs.