Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal quashes reassessment, rejects capital gain addition due to lack of evidence.</h1> <h3>Arun Kumar Choudhary Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward, Tonk.</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 and rejecting the addition of long-term capital gain ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Capital gain computation - reference to the provisions of Section 50C - HELD THAT:- Section 50C(1) specifically provides that where the consideration received qua transfer of land is less than the value adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority, the value so adopted shall, for the purposes of Section 48, be deemed to be the full value of the consideration received as a result of the transfer. Section 48 of the Act provides the mode of computation of capital gains. A conjoint reading of Sections 50C and 48 of the Act shows that the deeming provisions of Section 50C are only for such computation. That being so, as rightly contended, the valuation adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority cannot, by itself, be made the basis for reopening the concluded assessment. A mere adoption of higher value of the property by the Stamp Valuation Authority cannot lead to a formation of belief of escapement of income, particularly when the value so adopted is adopted for stamp duty purposes only. It is nowhere the case of the department that the AO had brought on record any tangible material whatsoever to suggest escapement of income, which could have, besides the Inspector’s report, led to the formation of belief of escapement of income. It is trite, as also considered in the case of ‘Income Tax Officer Vs. Shiv Shakti Build Home (P) Ltd.’ [2011 (2) TMI 760 - ITAT, JODHPUR] that there has to be a nexus between the formation of the belief and the alleged escapement of income. In the absence of any positive material brought on the record by the Assessing Officer to suggest escapement of income, no such nexus exists herein. - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues:1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147.2. Addition of long-term capital gain under Section 50C.3. Addition of cash deposited in the bank account.Issue 1: Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147:The appellant contested the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147, arguing that the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material to suggest income escapement. The appellant relied on a precedent where it was held that the Stamp Valuation Authority's valuation alone cannot justify income escapement. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing the necessity of a nexus between the belief of income escapement and tangible evidence. As no substantial material was presented besides the Inspector's report, the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, following the precedent. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the appeal was allowed.Issue 2: Addition of long-term capital gain under Section 50C:The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on information regarding the sale of a property at a lower value compared to the Stamp Valuation Authority's assessment. The appellant challenged this action, citing a precedent emphasizing the need for a valid reason to suspect income escapement. The Tribunal reiterated that Section 50C's deeming provisions are limited to computation and cannot solely justify reassessment. As the department failed to provide substantial evidence supporting income escapement beyond the valuation, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument and quashed the reassessment proceedings.Issue 3: Addition of cash deposited in the bank account:The appellant contested the addition of cash deposited in the bank account. However, this issue was not extensively discussed in the judgment, and the Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 and the addition of long-term capital gain under Section 50C. Consequently, no specific details or analysis were provided regarding the addition of cash deposited in the bank account.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 and rejecting the addition of long-term capital gain under Section 50C due to insufficient evidence supporting income escapement. The judgment highlighted the importance of tangible material and a direct nexus between the belief of income escapement and the evidence presented by the Assessing Officer.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found