TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The sole issue in all three appeals was whether the credit of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, includes surcharge and cess besides the normal rate of tax.
The assessee filed returns declaring income under normal provisions and MAT provisions. The tax liability under normal provisions was higher, and the assessee claimed MAT credit for taxes paid in earlier years, excluding surcharge and cess. The Assessing Officer, while giving effect to the ITAT's order, recalculated the tax liability including surcharge and cess, but excluded them from MAT credit.
The assessee filed an application under section 154, which was rejected by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal, stating that the issue was decided in favor of the assessee in previous assessments and referenced ITAT decisions in similar cases.
The Revenue appealed, arguing that the ITAT had previously decided the issue against the assessee, referencing the ITAT Delhi decision in M/s Richa Global Export Pvt Ltd.
The ITAT analyzed the relevant provisions, including section 115JAA and section 115JB, and the definition of "tax" under section 2(43). The ITAT referred to the Finance Act provisions, which specify that the tax rate under section 115JB includes surcharge and cess. The ITAT also cited the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs K. Srinivasan, which held that "tax" includes surcharge and cess.
The ITAT concluded that MAT credit under section 115JAA includes surcharge and cess. The ITAT distinguished the decision in M/s Richa Global Export Pvt Ltd, noting that the Supreme Court decision in K. Srinivasan was not considered in that case.
Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to allow MAT credit inclusive of surcharge and cess.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 11.10.2018.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
