TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Orders Quick Action on Cases Involving Politicians, Urges Setup of Special Courts</h1> <h3>ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.</h3> ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. - TMI Issues:1. Establishment of Special Courts for criminal cases involving political persons.2. Disposal of cases involving Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) and Members of Parliament (MPs).3. Information on criminal cases against present or former legislators (MP/MLA).4. Financial implications and setting up of Special Courts.5. Power exercised under Section 11 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 by the Election Commission.Analysis:1. The Supreme Court directed the Competent Authority in the Union Government to provide information on the disposal of 1581 cases involving MLAs and MPs within one year, acquittals/convictions, and any new criminal cases against legislators. The Court suggested a Central Scheme for setting up Special Courts exclusively for such cases, similar to Fast Track Courts, subject to availability of finances with states.2. The Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of cases involving political persons and requested a scheme to be presented for setting up Special Courts. The availability of funds for infrastructure, appointment of Judicial Officers, and other manpower requirements would be addressed based on the funds earmarked for this purpose. The Court scheduled further consideration of the matter for December 13, 2017.3. The Additional Solicitor General assured the Court that the required information would be submitted within six weeks. Additionally, the Election Commission was granted two weeks to provide an affidavit detailing the cases where the power under Section 11 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 had been exercised in the past. This information would contribute to the overall assessment of the situation regarding criminal cases involving political persons.4. The Court's proactive approach in addressing the issue of delayed justice in cases involving legislators highlights the importance of setting up dedicated Special Courts. By involving the Union Government and Election Commission, the Court aims to streamline the process and ensure timely disposal of such cases. The financial aspect and coordination with state governments are crucial elements in the implementation of this directive.5. The involvement of various legal representatives and officials underscores the significance of this judgment in promoting accountability and expediency in the judicial system, particularly concerning cases involving political figures. The Court's focus on transparency and effective resolution of these cases through the establishment of Special Courts reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice is served promptly in such matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
