TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the revision under section 263 was justified on the ground that surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax had not been disallowed under section 40(a)(iib). (ii) Whether gallonage fee paid under the Foreign Liquor Rules was liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(iib). (iii) Whether licence fee and shop rental paid for exclusive liquor licences were liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(iib).
Issue (i): Whether the revision under section 263 was justified on the ground that surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax had not been disallowed under section 40(a)(iib).
Analysis: The assessment order was passed without enquiry into the applicability of section 40(a)(iib) to the levies claimed as expenditure. Section 263 permits revision where an assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, including cases where the Assessing Officer accepts a claim without the requisite verification. The surcharge and turnover tax issues were not examined by the Assessing Officer, and the Commissioner found that the omission had resulted in loss of revenue.
Conclusion: The revision under section 263 was valid and the assessee's challenge failed.
Issue (ii): Whether gallonage fee paid under the Foreign Liquor Rules was liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(iib).
Analysis: The levy was examined with reference to the mode and method of imposition, not merely its nomenclature. The gallonage fee under Rule 15A of the Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 was payable in relation to an exclusively granted FL-9 licence held by the assessee. The existence of a similar fee under another set of rules did not alter the character of the levy for the purpose of section 40(a)(iib).
Conclusion: The disallowance of gallonage fee under section 40(a)(iib) was upheld.
Issue (iii): Whether licence fee and shop rental paid for exclusive liquor licences were liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(iib).
Analysis: The assessee held exclusive FL-1 and FL-9 licences granted year to year by the State. The expression used in section 40(a)(iib) covers amounts levied exclusively on State Government undertakings by the State Government, and not merely amounts levied exclusively on one particular undertaking. On the facts, licence fee and shop rental were charges arising from exclusive State-granted licences and therefore fell within the statutory mischief.
Conclusion: The disallowance of licence fee and shop rental under section 40(a)(iib) was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed in full, as the revisionary action and all disallowances under section 40(a)(iib) were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment can be revised under section 263 when a prima facie warranted enquiry into a deduction claim is omitted, and any fee or charge levied exclusively on State Government undertakings by the State Government falls within section 40(a)(iib) even if the charge is connected with an exclusive licence or similar statutory arrangement.
TaxTMI 
