We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Tribunal Admits Insolvency Application, Appoints Resolution Professional, Imposes Moratorium The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, directed a deposit by the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, directed a deposit by the Operational Creditor, and imposed a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to facilitate the resolution process.
Issues: 1. Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process 2. Default in payment by Corporate Debtor 3. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal 4. Barred by limitation or not 5. Compliance with requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional 7. Deposit by Operational Creditor 8. Moratorium under Section 14(1) of IBC, 2016
1. Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: The application was filed by M/S. Roofs and Ceilings (I) Pvt. Ltd. to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/S. Dugal Associates Pvt. Ltd. The applicant provided details of the business transactions, invoices raised, and the outstanding amount due from the Corporate Debtor.
2. Default in payment by Corporate Debtor: Despite repeated requests and a demand notice issued by the Operational Creditor, the Corporate Debtor failed to make the payment of the outstanding amount along with interest. The Corporate Debtor neither replied to the demand notice nor made any payment, leading to the filing of the application.
3. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal: The Tribunal established its jurisdiction to entertain and try the application as the registered office of the Corporate Debtor was situated in New Delhi, where the present application was filed.
4. Barred by limitation or not: The application was not barred by limitation as the default date was determined to be 28.07.2017, and the application was filed on 28.09.2019, falling within the statutory limitation period.
5. Compliance with requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: The applicant fulfilled the requirements under Section 9(3)(b) by stating that no notice of dispute was raised by the Corporate Debtor. Additionally, the applicant provided a bank statement in compliance with Section 9(3)(c) of the IBC 2016.
6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional: The Bench appointed Mr. Pradeep Upadhyay as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of the Corporate Debtor. The IRP was directed to take necessary steps as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
7. Deposit by Operational Creditor: The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2 Lakh with the IRP to meet the expenses required for the resolution process. The amount deposited would be subject to adjustment by the Committee of Creditors and later refunded to the Operational Creditor.
8. Moratorium under Section 14(1) of IBC, 2016: As a consequence of the application being admitted, a moratorium was imposed under Section 14(1) of the IBC, 2016, prohibiting various actions against the Corporate Debtor. Essential supplies to the Corporate Debtor were to continue during the moratorium period, with specific exceptions outlined in the order.
In conclusion, the Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, appointed an IRP, directed a deposit by the Operational Creditor, and imposed a moratorium to facilitate the resolution process.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.