Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suit for injunction against the Tax Recovery Officer was maintainable in the absence of notice to and joinder of the Central Government under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: The relief sought was to restrain recovery proceedings initiated for arrears of income-tax due to the Central Government. Since any restraint on the sale would directly affect the Central Government, it was treated as a necessary party to the suit. The notice requirement under Section 80 extended both to the Government and to the public officer acting in his official capacity. As no notice had been issued to the Central Government and it was not impleaded, the statutory requirement was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The suit was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 80 and non-joinder of the Central Government.