Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fee under section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied while processing TDS statements under section 200A for periods prior to 01.06.2015.
Analysis: The amended clauses in section 200A, inserted by the Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 01.06.2015, were held to operate prospectively. For the assessment year involved, the TDS statements related to a period prior to that date. Following the earlier coordinate bench view and the conclusion adopted in the relevant precedent, levy of fee under section 234E through processing under section 200A for the pre-01.06.2015 period was treated as impermissible.
Conclusion: Fee under section 234E could not be levied while processing TDS statements under section 200A for the period prior to 01.06.2015. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.