Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Writ appeal allowed, petition restored for fresh consideration on limitation issue under KVAT Act</h1> <h3>C.P. Mariyamma Versus The Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) III, The Commissioner, State Goods And Service Tax Department, Kerala, State Of Kerala, Union of India</h3> C.P. Mariyamma Versus The Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) III, The Commissioner, State Goods And Service Tax Department, Kerala, State Of Kerala, ... Issues:Challenge to assessment order under KVAT Act, validity of Section 174 of Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, limitation under Section 25(1) of KVAT Act.Analysis:The petitioner challenged the assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, contending that the assessment is barred under Section 25(1) of the Act. Additionally, there was a challenge against the 101st amendment of the Constitution and the provision of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.The writ petition, along with others, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge, citing a previous judgment that only addressed the validity of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, not considering the limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. The Special Government Pleader acknowledged this omission, leading to the decision to remit the writ petition for fresh consideration specifically on the question of limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act.Consequently, the writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned judgment and restoring the writ petition. The Registry was instructed to place the writ petition before the appropriate Single Judge for reconsideration. It was clarified that the previous judgment on the validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act would be binding. Any interim order in effect before the dismissal of the writ petition would continue to remain in force.