Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs Liquidator to admit APMC claim, lift asset attachments for smooth liquidation process</h1> <h3>Allahabad Bank, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, (Liquidator of Biotor Industries Limited) Versus Versus Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax,</h3> Allahabad Bank, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, (Liquidator of Biotor Industries Limited) Versus Versus Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Assistant ... Issues Involved:1. Treatment of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee's (APMC) claim as a secured creditor.2. Lifting of attachments on the assets of the Corporate Debtor by various government and semi-government authorities.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Treatment of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee's (APMC) claim as a secured creditor:The application by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) sought an order to deal with the property attached by the Mamlatdar and realize the value of the secured asset towards the satisfaction of its claim amounting to Rs. 7,72,77,837.96. Alternatively, the APMC requested that its claim be considered on par with other secured creditors and that the net sale proceeds from the liquidation of the company's assets be distributed on a pari-passu basis with secured creditors having the first charge on the assets.The APMC argued that it is deemed a local authority under Section 10(2) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963, and thus should be treated as a secured creditor. The Corporate Debtor, formerly known as Jayant Oil Mills, had not paid the market fees levied on castor seeds purchased within the Market Area, leading to the claim.The Tribunal noted that the liquidation order for the Corporate Debtor was passed on 31.12.2018, and the APMC had submitted its claim in Form-G on 21.01.2019, which the Liquidator rejected as a secured creditor. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory provisions of Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code), which prescribes the distribution of proceeds from the sale of liquidation assets in a specific order of priority. According to Section 53(1)(e), the APMC's debt falls under government dues and ranks equally among such dues.Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Liquidator to admit the APMC's claim as submitted and consider it at the time of distributing the sale proceeds on liquidation of assets. The application was partly allowed to this extent.2. Lifting of attachments on the assets of the Corporate Debtor by various government and semi-government authorities:The Liquidator filed an application seeking an order to lift the attachments on the Corporate Debtor's assets by various government and semi-government authorities. The Liquidator also requested an exclusion of the time taken for the release of attachments for calculating the period for completion of liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.The Tribunal referred to its previous order dated 31.12.2018, which directed the Liquidator to obtain a list of attached properties from each department and adjudicate the same. Despite clear directions, the attachments were not lifted, causing hindrance in the liquidation process. The Tribunal cited a recent judgment by the Hyderabad High Court in Leo Edibles & Fats Ltd. v. Tax Recovery Officer (Central) IT Dept. Hyderabad & Ors., which held that an order of attachment by a government authority cannot bar the completion of the sale of liquidated assets.The Liquidator informed the Tribunal that claims from various departments, including Sales Tax Departments of Mumbai and Vadodara, APMC, Income Tax Department, and Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Ahmedabad, had already been admitted.The Tribunal directed the concerned authorities to lift the attachments to allow the Liquidator to sell the property as per the rules and regulations. The sale proceeds were to be distributed under Section 53 of the I&B Code in the prescribed order of priority. The Liquidator was instructed to report back to the Tribunal on compliance with these directions.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found