Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment made by the Income-tax Officer was in accordance with section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The assessment for the earlier year had already been completed and had become final, including confirmation on appeal. The later officer did not act to bring to tax income that had truly escaped assessment for the relevant year, but instead attempted to reopen and revise the completed assessment merely because he disagreed with his predecessor's estimate of quantity and profit. Section 34 did not confer jurisdiction to revisit a concluded assessment on that basis.
Conclusion: The reassessment was not valid under section 34 and could not be sustained; the penalty founded on that reassessment also failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A completed and final assessment cannot be reopened under section 34 merely because a subsequent officer disagrees with the earlier estimate of taxable income.