TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to rework index cost for capital gains & adopt assessee's sale value.</h1> <h3>Hemaben Bharatbhai Desai Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (3) (2), Surat.</h3> Hemaben Bharatbhai Desai Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (3) (2), Surat. - TMI Issues:1. Valuation of long term capital gain on sale of land2. Addition based on the difference in Jantri Value under section 50C of the ActAnalysis:Issue 1: Valuation of long term capital gain on sale of landThe appeal was against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the addition of long term capital gain on the sale of land. The Assessing Officer (AO) had added a certain amount to the capital gain based on the valuation of the land. The Dispute Resolution Officer (DVO) valued the land at a different rate compared to the declared value by the assessee. The Commissioner observed discrepancies in the valuation methods used by the DVO and the Registered Valuer. After considering various factors, the Commissioner directed the AO to rework the index cost of acquisition. The Tribunal upheld the argument of the assessee, considering the average value determined by the Registered Valuer, DVO, and Commissioner as more reasonable. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the taxable long term gain based on this average value.Issue 2: Addition based on the difference in Jantri Value under section 50C of the ActThe second ground of appeal related to the addition made by the AO based on the difference in Jantri Value under section 50C of the Act. The stamp valuation authorities had determined a higher value compared to the sale consideration shown in the registered sale deed. The AO added a certain amount representing the difference in these values. The assessee contended that the difference was less than 10%, and therefore, no addition should be made. The Commissioner upheld the addition based on the constitutional validity of section 50C. However, the Tribunal, considering the ratio of relevant decisions and the fact that the difference was less than 10%, directed the AO to adopt the value as declared by the assessee. Consequently, the additions made by the AO under section 50C were deleted, and the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to rework the index cost of acquisition for the long term capital gain and to adopt the valuation of sale consideration as declared by the assessee for the Jantri Value issue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
