TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal on disallowance under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>ACIT 14 (2) (2), Mumbai Versus M/s. Proficient Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai</h3> ACIT 14 (2) (2), Mumbai Versus M/s. Proficient Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - TMI Issues:- Disallowance under section 14A rule 8D of the Income Tax Act in relation to the expenditure incurred for investments made for earning of exempt income.Detailed Analysis:1. The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relevant to assessment year 2010-11. The Revenue contested the deletion of disallowance of &8377;1,82,31,213/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 14A rule 8D of the Income Tax Act concerning the expenditure incurred for investments made for earning exempt income.2. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance after considering various case laws. The assessee's representative argued that no disallowance was warranted under section 14A for passive investments in group companies. It was highlighted that the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant year, and the investments were strategic in group companies for holding controlling stakes, not for earning exempt income. The representative relied on previous Tribunal decisions and a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court to support the case.3. The Revenue failed to present any distinguishing facts or case laws to counter the assessee's arguments. The Tribunal found that the case of the assessee aligned with the decisions cited, where strategic investments in group concerns without the purpose of earning exempt income did not warrant disallowance under section 14A.4. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. The decision was pronounced in open court on 18.03.2016.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive overview of the issues involved, the arguments presented by both parties, the legal precedents relied upon, and the final decision rendered by the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
