Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of imported wooden furniture could be enhanced on a pro rata basis merely because the actual weight found on physical verification was higher than the declared weight, when the goods were assessable on a unit basis under Chapter 9403 89 90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The declared transaction value in the proforma invoices was not disputed. The imported items were wooden furniture assessable as unit goods and not on weight. Excess weight noticed at examination, by itself, did not alter the declared transaction value or justify loading the invoice price on a pro rata basis. Since the valuation adopted by the importer was not shown to be false or suppressed, enhancement based only on weight difference was not legally sustainable.
Conclusion: The pro rata enhancement of value was unjustified and the demand, confiscation and penalty could not be sustained.