Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee-company was entitled to depreciation under section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the Crown Flour Mills when no registered sale deed had been executed in its favour during the relevant previous year.
Analysis: Depreciation under section 32(1) is available only to the owner of the asset. The words used in the provision were treated as equivalent to ownership, and the corresponding position under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was noted to be the same. A right arising under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was held not to amount to ownership. Since the property was immovable property of more than Rs. 100 in value, title could pass only by a registered sale deed, which had not been executed during the relevant year.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to depreciation because the Crown Flour Mills was not its property during the assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: Depreciation under section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is admissible only on ownership of the asset, and a possessory interest under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not constitute such ownership absent a registered conveyance.