TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Authority quashes prior ruling on works contract classification, directs fresh Advance Ruling</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd.</h3> In Re: M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd. - 2020 (34) G. S. T. L. 333 (App. A. A. R. - GST - Haryana) Issues:1. Appeal against Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/07 dated 22.08.2018 regarding the classification of services provided by M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd. as a works contract under the CGST Act and the HGST Act.Analysis:The appeal was filed by M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd. against the Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/07, dated 22.08.2018, seeking clarification on the classification of their services related to setting up a Solar Power Generating System (SPGS) on a turnkey basis. The questions raised by the appellant included whether the services provided constituted a 'Composite Supply' under Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, whether certain supplies would be considered as the 'Principal Supply,' and the applicability of a concessional rate of 5% on the entire contract value. The Advance Ruling Authority had initially classified the services as falling under the definition of a 'works contract' as per section 2(119), leading to the appeal by M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd.The appellant presented various grounds in their appeal, arguing that the transaction should be considered a composite supply taxed at 5%, that the proposed contracts did not qualify as works contracts under the CGST Act, and that issues related to property movability had been resolved under previous excise laws. Additionally, they contended that the ruling was non-speaking and violated principles of natural justice. During the personal hearing, the appellant's counsel reiterated these grounds and highlighted changes in tax rates post-amendments effective from 01.01.2019, impacting the legal context of the case.The Appellate Authority, after thorough consideration, noted the changes in tax rates and percentages post-amendments introduced by notifications dated 31.12.2018 under the CGST and HGST Acts. Given the altered circumstances, the Authority ruled that the Advance Ruling issued on 22.08.2018 was no longer binding post the amendments. Consequently, the Authority quashed the previous ruling and directed M/s. Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd. to seek a fresh Advance Ruling, emphasizing that the decision was not an opinion on the case's merits. The appellant was advised to approach the Advance Ruling Authority for a fresh determination in line with the updated legal framework, thereby concluding the matter without delving into the substantive issues of the case.
TaxTMI 