TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Allowed Due to Notice Defect: Land Acquisition Act Section 12(2) vs. Section 45</h1> <h3>Rajah Papamma Rao Garu and Ors. Versus Revenue Divisional Officer</h3> The appeal was allowed as the service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act was found to be non-compliant with Section 45. The ... - The appeal questioned proper service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act on the Manager in the absence of the Receiver. The Court found that the service was not in conformity with Section 45 and provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure were not complied with. The appeal was allowed, the decree of the District Judge was reversed, and the case was remanded for disposal according to law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
