TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules deceased father, not Hariram Sait, liable for income concealment.</h1> <h3>Hariram Sait (T.P.S.) Versus Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that Hariram Sait was not personally responsible for concealing income under the Indian ... - The High Court of Madras considered a case regarding the levy of a penalty under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act on Hariram Sait for the assessment year 1943-44. The court found that Hariram Sait was not personally responsible for concealing income, as it was mainly done by his deceased father Sokkalal. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that there was no basis for the penalty imposed on Hariram Sait.
TaxTMI 
