Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Section 66(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the High Court has jurisdiction to require the Commissioner of Income-tax to state a case and refer for decision any question of law which was not duly raised before the Commissioner under Section 66(2).
Analysis: Section 66 provides a special, statutory procedure by which questions of law arising in the course of assessment are to be referred to the High Court by way of a case stated. Section 66(2) prescribes the procedure by which an assessee may require the Commissioner to draw up and refer a case, and Section 66(3) permits the assessee to apply to the High Court where the Commissioner refuses to state a case on the ground that no question of law arises. The statutory scheme confines the High Court's seisin under Section 66(3) to the specific questions of law that have been duly raised before the Commissioner and upon which the Commissioner has had an opportunity to express an opinion. Allowing the High Court, on an application under Section 66(3), to formulate and require reference of questions not raised under Section 66(2) would circumvent the prescribed statutory procedure, permit collateral excavation of new points at the High Court stage, and frustrate the deliberate preliminary requirements intended to limit such references.
Conclusion: Under Section 66(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 the High Court has no jurisdiction to require the Commissioner to state a case in respect of questions of law not duly raised under Section 66(2); conclusion against the assessee.