Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the interest amounts payable on deferred purchase price under the lease deed and consent decree were deductible as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, or as interest on borrowed capital under section 10(2)(iii) of that Act.
Analysis: The liability to pay interest arose not from borrowing capital for the business, but from the assessee's default in paying the purchase price when it became due and from the terms of the consent decree granting time for payment by instalments. The amounts payable were part of the consideration for acquisition of the land and formed an addition to the purchase price. The business of printing and publishing could not be treated as so inseparably linked with the acquisition of the land as to make the interest expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the business. The transaction was therefore distinguishable from cases where interest on borrowed funds used in an integrated business acquisition was held to be revenue expenditure.
Conclusion: The amounts were neither interest on borrowed capital within section 10(2)(iii) nor expenditure wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business within section 10(2)(xv); the deduction was not allowable.