Tribunal Overturns Assessment Disallowing Transfer Pricing Adjustment on AMP Expenses

The Tribunal set aside the assessment order disallowing transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenses for the assessment year 2010-11. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to verify the actual incurrence of AMP expenses to avoid disallowance. The Tribunal referred the matter back to the TPO for a fresh determination on whether AMP expenses constituted an international transaction, considering evolving judicial precedents. Other grounds not argued by the assessee were dismissed, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of transfer pricing adjustment on account of AMP expenses.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under sections 143(3) and 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11. The primary argument presented was that the assessee did not incur any expenditure on advertisement, marketing, and promotion (AMP), and the expenses noted were selling expenses, citing legal provisions that restrict advertisement expenses. Additionally, it was contended that AMP expenses were not an international transaction, thus questioning the determination of arm's length price and any addition based on it. Reference was made to judgments of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court to support the argument that AMP expenses should not be considered an international transaction.

On the contrary, the Department argued that AMP expenses were an international transaction, referring to a judgment where AMP expenses were held to be international. They highlighted that the issue had been restored for fresh determination in various cases based on the judgment regarding AMP expenses as an international transaction. The Tribunal considered both arguments and found that the contention solely based on legal provisions did not prove the absence of AMP expenses. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to verify if AMP expenses were actually incurred and determine accordingly to avoid disallowance.

Regarding the argument that AMP expenses were not an international transaction, the Tribunal acknowledged the evolving judicial precedents on this matter. Considering the differing views on whether AMP expenses constituted an international transaction, the Tribunal decided to set aside the order and referred the matter back to the TPO for a fresh determination. The TPO was instructed to establish the existence of an international transaction of AMP expenses and determine the arm's length price accordingly, following relevant High Court judgments. The Tribunal dismissed other grounds not argued by the assessee, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.

---