Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts received as fees for storing crops, punyaha nazar paid by tenants, and nazar paid on petitions relating to succession, settlement, and partition constituted agricultural income exempt from assessment.
Analysis: The payments for storage of crops were not derived from land used for agricultural purposes and therefore did not fall within the statutory definition of agricultural income. Punyaha nazar was held to be a voluntary payment without uniformity, compulsion, or enforceable right, and was not income derived from agricultural land. Nazar paid on petitions concerning succession, settlement, and partition was likewise too remote from agricultural operations and was not a payment made for recognition of succession, partition, or settlement in the sense that could attract agricultural-income treatment. The earlier authority relied upon concerned nazar paid on recognition of transfer of a non-transferable holding, which was treated as part of the capitalized value of rent and stood on a different footing.
Conclusion: The amounts in question were not agricultural income and were assessable to income tax; the answer was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the disputed receipts did not enjoy exemption as agricultural income and remained taxable.
Ratio Decidendi: A receipt is agricultural income only if it is derived from land used for agricultural purposes or has a sufficiently direct connection with such land; voluntary or remote payments connected with tenancy or administrative petitions do not qualify.