Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was correct in declining to state and refer a case under Section 66(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 on the ground that no question of law arose.
Analysis: The disputed sum of Rs. 17,051 was recorded in the assessee's books as received from a named person; the assessee claimed it as a gift but offered no documentary proof or evidence of the donor's means. The Income-tax Officer treated the entry as representing profits of past years; the Assistant Commissioner, on examination of earlier accounts, found a pattern of regular receipts from the same source and inferred a secret business generating income. The issue whether the entry represented gift or taxable income turns on evaluation of the account books and the assessee's statements and prior year conduct; these matters involve factual findings and inferences from the evidence rather than a question of law.
Conclusion: The Commissioner'sdecision that no question of law arose is correct; the request to state and refer a case under Section 66(3) is refused. The application is dismissed with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the resolution of a dispute depends on factual findings drawn from account books and the assessee's statements, and the determination involves inference as to whether receipts are gifts or income, the matter is a question of fact and does not constitute a question of law for reference under Section 66(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.