Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (4) TMI 1511 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Company Court sale supervision and secured creditor rights can coexist without relinquishment of security in winding-up proceedings A provisional liquidator has the same powers as a liquidator unless the court restricts them, and the Company Court may supervise sale of company assets ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Company Court sale supervision and secured creditor rights can coexist without relinquishment of security in winding-up proceedings

                          A provisional liquidator has the same powers as a liquidator unless the court restricts them, and the Company Court may supervise sale of company assets through the Official Liquidator even before a winding-up order. A secured creditor's possession under SARFAESI, later handed over under court direction, does not by itself amount to relinquishment of security; such remedies remain cumulative, subject to statutory pari passu claims of workmen. In an integrated industrial unit, machinery installed in another company's premises may be included in a composite sale where segregation would reduce value. Leased or already-transferred equipment may not be excluded where title has passed or consent to sale was given.




                          Issues: (i) whether the provisional liquidator, and the Company Court on an application by a secured creditor, could direct sale of the company's assets before a winding-up order and whether the sale had to be conducted through the official liquidator; (ii) whether IREDA's taking possession under SARFAESI and later handing over possession to the provisional liquidator amounted to relinquishment of its security or prevented it from standing outside the winding up proceedings; (iii) whether the machinery of New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited installed in the factory premises of Arunachalam Sugar Mills could be included in the sale of the latter's assets; and (iv) whether Sundaram Finance Limited, BHEL and Walchandnagar Industries Limited could exclude their equipment from sale or claim priority over the assets in liquidation.

                          Issue (i): whether the provisional liquidator, and the Company Court on an application by a secured creditor, could direct sale of the company's assets before a winding-up order and whether the sale had to be conducted through the official liquidator.

                          Analysis: Section 450(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 confers on a provisional liquidator the same powers as a liquidator unless the Court limits them. The order appointing the provisional liquidator did not restrict those powers. The Court also retained supervisory jurisdiction to direct sale of the assets through the official liquidator. Rule 272 of the Companies (Court) Rules, read with Sections 446, 456 and 457(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 1956, permitted sale under the Court's control in the course of winding-up proceedings, even at the stage of a pending winding-up petition.

                          Conclusion: The Court held that the provisional liquidator was not disabled from participating in the sale and that the Company Court could direct sale of the assets through the official liquidator even before the winding-up order.

                          Issue (ii): whether IREDA's taking possession under SARFAESI and later handing over possession to the provisional liquidator amounted to relinquishment of its security or prevented it from standing outside the winding up proceedings.

                          Analysis: Under Sections 13(2), 13(4), 13(9) and 37 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, a secured creditor's remedies are cumulative and are not excluded by the Companies Act, 1956. The handing over of possession was pursuant to the Company Court's direction and not a voluntary surrender of security. Relinquishment requires a conscious and positive act. The Court held that a secured creditor could approach the Company Court for sale while still retaining its character as a secured creditor, subject to the statutory pari passu claims of workmen under Section 529-A.

                          Conclusion: The Court held that IREDA had not relinquished its security and was entitled to act as a secured creditor while participating in the sale process.

                          Issue (iii): whether the machinery of New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited installed in the factory premises of Arunachalam Sugar Mills could be included in the sale of the latter's assets.

                          Analysis: The energy-efficiency equipment financed to New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited was installed in the premises of Arunachalam Sugar Mills and formed part of an integrated industrial unit. Segregation of that equipment would diminish value and frustrate an effective sale. Since IREDA held security over the equipment and had retained its claim over it, the Court treated the assets as capable of being sold together for better realisation.

                          Conclusion: The Court held that the machinery of New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited could be brought to sale along with the assets of Arunachalam Sugar Mills.

                          Issue (iv): whether Sundaram Finance Limited, BHEL and Walchandnagar Industries Limited could exclude their equipment from sale or claim priority over the assets in liquidation.

                          Analysis: Sundaram Finance Limited owned the leased machinery and had consented to its sale as part of the composite unit, so its claim was not a ground to stop the sale. BHEL's equipment had already passed in title to the purchaser under the contract, and its lien stood terminated on lawful delivery and possession; it was therefore only an unsecured creditor. Walchandnagar Industries Limited's boiler had likewise passed in title to the company, and its possessory lien had ceased, leaving it to rank as an unsecured creditor.

                          Conclusion: The Court held that Sundaram Finance Limited could not resist the sale, and BHEL and Walchandnagar Industries Limited were only unsecured creditors with no right to exclude the equipment from the sale pool.

                          Final Conclusion: The common order directing sale of the assets of Arunachalam Sugar Mills and the connected machinery of New Horizon Sugar Mills was affirmed, with the sale to proceed under the supervision of the Company Court and the Official Liquidator at the revised upset price fixed by the Court.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A secured creditor may seek sale of assets in winding-up proceedings without thereby relinquishing its security, and the Company Court may direct an integrated sale of assets under its supervision so long as the secured creditor's rights and the statutory pari passu claims of workmen are preserved.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found