Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Court Rules Unexplained Credits as Taxable Income</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal III Versus Orissa Steel Corporation Pvt. Limited</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal III Versus Orissa Steel Corporation Pvt. Limited - [1983] 144 ITR 662, 31 CTR 160, 12 TAXMANN 74 Issues Involved:1. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to sums introduced in the books of the assessee for the year ending 31st December, 1961.2. Taxability of cash credits in the books of the assessee for the previous year ending 31st December, 1961, for the assessment year 1962-63.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Applicability of Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961The primary question was whether the sums introduced in the books of the assessee for the year ending 31st December, 1961, but credited before 1st April, 1961, could be taxed for the assessment year 1962-63 under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had held that these sums could not be brought to tax for the assessment year 1962-63.The Tribunal's view was that the law applicable on the first day of April of a particular assessment year should be applied. It noted that Section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961, had no retrospective effect and thus, the law as of 1st April, 1961, did not incorporate Section 68. The Tribunal further opined that income from undisclosed sources should be taxed in the earliest assessment year in which it became assessable. Therefore, credits occurring in the financial year 1960-61 could only be considered for the assessment year 1961-62.However, upon review, it was concluded that Section 68 applies to any sum found credited in the books of an assessee maintained for any previous year, and if no satisfactory explanation is offered, the sum may be charged to income-tax as the income of that previous year. The court noted that the assessment year under consideration was 1962-63, and the previous year was from 1st January, 1961, to 31st December, 1961. Therefore, the sums credited in the books during this period should be assessed under Section 68 for the assessment year 1962-63.Issue 2: Taxability of Cash Credits for the Previous Year Ending 31st December, 1961The second question was whether the cash credits in the books of the assessee for the previous year ending 31st December, 1961, could be taxed for the assessment year 1962-63. The Tribunal had held that credits falling within the financial year 1960-61 could not be taxed in the assessment year 1962-63.The Tribunal relied on the principle that income-tax is an annual tax and should be applied based on the law effective on the first day of April of the assessment year. It argued that since Section 68 was part of the I.T. Act, 1961, effective from 1st April, 1962, it did not apply to credits from the financial year 1960-61. The Tribunal also referred to decisions from the Supreme Court and other High Courts to support its view that income from undisclosed sources should be taxed in the earliest assessment year in which it became assessable.Upon review, the court disagreed with the Tribunal's interpretation. It emphasized that Section 68 applies to any sum found credited in the books of an assessee for any previous year, and if no satisfactory explanation is provided, the sum may be taxed as income for that previous year. The court clarified that the assessment year 1962-63 and the previous year from 1st January, 1961, to 31st December, 1961, were relevant for applying Section 68. Thus, the cash credits for the previous year ending 31st December, 1961, should be taxed for the assessment year 1962-63.Conclusion:The court concluded that the Tribunal was in error in holding that the sums found in the books of the assessee for the year ending 31st December, 1961, could not be brought to tax for the assessment year 1962-63. Similarly, it held that the Tribunal was wrong in concluding that the cash credits for the previous year ending 31st December, 1961, could not be taxed for the assessment year 1962-63. The court emphasized that the moment a sum is found credited in the books for which no satisfactory explanation is offered, it should be taxed as income for that previous year, regardless of whether the credits represented income from undisclosed sources in an earlier year. The questions were answered in favor of the Revenue, and each party was to bear its own costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found