Supreme Court upholds road reclassification in Chandigarh, affirms liquor sale restrictions

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the reclassification of roads in Chandigarh, clarifying that the reclassification did not violate previous directives on controlling liquor sales along highways. The Court emphasized that the earlier judgment targeted highways for inter-city connectivity, not internal city roads like those in Chandigarh, ensuring clarity and effective implementation of liquor sale restrictions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of directions issued in a previous judgment regarding the sale of liquor along highways.
2. Challenge to a notification reclassifying roads in Chandigarh from state highways to major district roads.
3. Consideration of the purpose and applicability of the previous judgment on the reclassification of roads within a city.

Analysis:
1. The Supreme Court previously issued directions in a judgment to prevent dangers from drunken driving on highways, including prohibiting the sale of liquor along national and state highways. The directions emphasized the prohibition of liquor sale visibility from highways, removal of liquor advertisements, and strict enforcement by state authorities. The judgment aimed to ensure safety on highways by restricting the availability of alcohol in highway proximity.

2. In the present case concerning Chandigarh, a notification reclassified major arterial roads as major district roads, excluding National Highway no. 21 and Madhya Marg. The High Court rejected a challenge to this notification, stating that the roads were inter-sectoral and primarily meant for internal connectivity within the city. The reclassification did not violate the previous judgment's directives as it focused on highways connecting different regions rather than internal city roads.

3. The Supreme Court clarified that the previous judgment targeted liquor sale control along highways facilitating inter-city connectivity, not internal city roads like those in Chandigarh. The reclassification of Chandigarh roads did not contradict the judgment's purpose, as it did not affect highways like National Highway no. 21 and Madhya Marg. The Court emphasized that the prohibition on liquor sale along highways did not extend to licensed establishments within municipal areas, providing clarity for similar cases in other areas.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the reclassification of Chandigarh roads, as it did not contravene the directions in the previous judgment regarding liquor sale control along highways. The Court's clarification aimed to prevent ambiguity and unnecessary legal interventions, ensuring the effective implementation of the directives issued in the earlier judgment.

---