Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the insurer waived the policy condition requiring prompt intimation of loss by appointing a surveyor after delayed notice of the claim.
Analysis: Waiver requires a conscious and intentional abandonment of an existing legal right with full knowledge of that right. The delayed intimation was given after a substantial gap, and the insurer's appointment of a surveyor, followed by repudiation expressly referring to breach of the policy condition, did not by itself establish waiver. The earlier decision relied on by the appellant was distinguished on facts, as it concerned a different insurance clause and a different factual setting. On the material on record, there was no clear indication that the insurer intended to forgo its right to rely on the delayed notice condition.
Conclusion: The insurer did not waive the condition relating to delay in intimation by appointing a surveyor.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed and the rejection of the insurance claim on the ground of breach of the prompt intimation condition was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Waiver of an insurance condition cannot be inferred from appointment of a surveyor alone; it must be proved from the totality of circumstances showing a conscious and intentional relinquishment of the right to rely on the policy breach.