Tribunal grants rehearing, rectifying procedural error, upholding natural justice.

The tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application, recalling the order and directing the appeal to be reheard before a regular bench. The decision aimed to rectify the procedural error that led to the dismissal of the appeal, ensuring the principles of natural justice were upheld by granting the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case effectively.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Rectification of an order due to alleged infringement of principles of natural justice by the tribunal.

Detailed Analysis:
The assessee filed a miscellaneous application seeking rectification of an order passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2009-10. The appeal was decided ex-parte on 17.10.2018, with the assessee claiming that principles of natural justice were violated during the proceedings. The appeal was initially fixed before the "J" Bench, but without notice to the assessee, it was shifted to the "G" Bench. The assessee's counsel was out of station on the hearing date, and an adjournment application was rejected by the Bench, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal found merit in the assessee's contentions, noting that the appeal was shifted to a different bench without proper intimation, causing the absence of the arguing counsel. The tribunal accepted the bonafide explanation provided by the counsel and ordered the recall of the dismissal order to grant the assessee another opportunity to present its case.

Thus, the tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application filed by the assessee, recalling the order dated 22.10.2018 and directing the appeal to be fixed before a regular bench for a fresh hearing. The decision was based on ensuring substantial justice and upholding principles of natural justice, acknowledging the justified reasons for the counsel's absence on the hearing date. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity to the assessee to present its case effectively, in accordance with the law.

In conclusion, the tribunal's judgment focused on rectifying the procedural error that led to the dismissal of the appeal in the absence of the arguing counsel. By recalling the order and granting a fresh opportunity to the assessee, the tribunal aimed to uphold the principles of natural justice and ensure a fair hearing where the assessee could plead its case on merits.

---