1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court allows delay in filing appeals before CESTAT, stresses fair opportunities for parties</h1> The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the condonation of delay in filing appeals before CESTAT in Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2012. The Court set aside CESTAT's ... - Issues involved: Condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).Summary:In Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2012, the High Court of Jharkhand considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals before CESTAT. The Court noted that the CESTAT had dismissed the application for condonation of delay, finding the grounds unsatisfactory. The appellant had argued that a related appeal by the Revenue was pending, and the appellant had also filed a cross-objection in that appeal. The Court observed that since the matter was sub judice before the appellate authority, including the cross-objection, it would be appropriate to condone the delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the Court set aside the orders passed by CESTAT and allowed the applications for condonation of delay, directing the Appellate Court to proceed. Additionally, the stay petitions filed in both appeals were disposed of.This judgment highlights the importance of providing valid grounds for condonation of delay in filing appeals before tribunals, and the significance of related proceedings in determining the outcome of such applications. The decision underscores the principle of allowing parties a fair opportunity to present their case before the appellate authority, even in situations involving delays in filing appeals.