Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (3) TMI 1790 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants deduction under section 80IB(10) for compliant units, emphasizes verification for accurate assessment. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify the built-up areas of the tenements and grant a proportionate deduction under section ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal grants deduction under section 80IB(10) for compliant units, emphasizes verification for accurate assessment.

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify the built-up areas of the tenements and grant a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for compliant units. The Tribunal clarified that the project commenced within the permissible period, making the assessee eligible for the deduction. It emphasized compliance with section 80IB(10) conditions and instructed the AO to conduct physical verifications for accurate assessment.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Commencement of the housing project before 01/10/1998.
                          3. Built-up area of tenements exceeding 1500 square feet.
                          4. Construction of tenements not fulfilling conditions laid down in section 80IB(10).
                          5. Denial of opportunity for cross-verification of parties/customers.
                          6. Proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for compliant tenements.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80IB(10):
                          The core issue in both appeals is the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80IB(10) of the Act. The assessee had claimed a deduction of Rs. 4,09,79,023/- for the project 'Parmar Garden'. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deduction, noting that certain tenements exceeded the built-up area of 1500 square feet, and that the project commenced before the stipulated date of 01/10/1998.

                          2. Commencement of the Housing Project Before 01/10/1998:
                          The AO noted that the commencement certificate from Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) was received on 01/08/1996, and various activities related to the project had started before 01/10/1998. These activities included demolition, road construction, and other developmental works. The CIT(A) upheld this view, stating that the land was fully developed and ready for construction by March 1997. However, the Tribunal found that the first valid building commencement certificate was dated 19/12/1998, which falls within the permissible period for claiming the deduction under section 80IB(10).

                          3. Built-up Area of Tenements Exceeding 1500 Square Feet:
                          The AO found that several tenements in buildings B-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and A-1 exceeded the built-up area of 1500 square feet, which violated the conditions of section 80IB(10). The CIT(A) agreed, noting that the combination of flats resulted in built-up areas exceeding the permissible limit. The Tribunal, however, directed the AO to verify the actual built-up area of each flat through a physical verification exercise and to allow the deduction proportionately for those units that complied with the area restrictions.

                          4. Construction of Tenements Not Fulfilling Conditions Laid Down in Section 80IB(10):
                          The AO and CIT(A) noted that the construction of certain tenements did not conform to the approved building plans, and some residential units were converted into commercial spaces. The Tribunal held that the role of the Income Tax authorities is to ensure compliance with the conditions laid down in section 80IB(10), and any violations of building plans should be addressed by the municipal authorities. The Tribunal directed that the deduction should be allowed proportionately for units that met the conditions.

                          5. Denial of Opportunity for Cross-verification of Parties/Customers:
                          The assessee contended that it was denied the opportunity to cross-verify the statements of parties/customers. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue but focused on the verification of the built-up area and compliance with section 80IB(10) conditions.

                          6. Proportionate Deduction under Section 80IB(10) for Compliant Tenements:
                          The Tribunal directed the AO to allow a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for those tenements that satisfied the conditions of the section. The AO was instructed to carry out a physical verification of the built-up areas and grant the deduction accordingly.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify the built-up areas of the tenements and grant a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for those units that complied with the conditions. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between layout plan approval and building plan approval, and held that the project commenced on 19/12/1998, making the assessee eligible for the deduction.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found