Tribunal Decisions on Commission, Depreciation, Disallowance, and Appeals for Assessment Years 2008-09 & 2009-10

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the disallowance of commission paid to Directors for Assessment Year 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of depreciation on computer peripherals and the writing off of advances and reimbursable amounts for Assessment Year 2008-09. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A for Assessment Year 2009-10, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate the issue, partially allowing the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and partly allowing the Revenue's appeal. The Department's appeal in one case was dismissed, while another was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of commission paid to Directors.
2. Depreciation on computer peripherals.
3. Writing off of advances and reimbursable amounts.
4. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Commission Paid to Directors:
- Assessment Year 2008-09 (I.T.A.No. 1672/Del/2012): The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 1,05,02,874/- paid to Directors as commission. The Tribunal referred to its own decision for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, where similar payments were allowed. The Tribunal noted that the directors held significant shares and had substantial experience. Citing judicial precedents, including the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Gestetner Duplicators Ltd. Vs CIT, the Tribunal concluded that commission paid to directors is a form of remuneration and thus allowed the appeal of the assessee.
- Assessment Year 2009-10 (I.T.A.No. 4706/Del/2012): The Revenue's appeal against the deletion of Rs. 1,07,50,748/- commission paid to Directors by the CIT(A) was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld its previous ruling that such payments constitute remuneration.

2. Depreciation on Computer Peripherals:
- Assessment Year 2008-09 (I.T.A.No. 2584/Del/2012): The CIT(A) allowed depreciation at the rate of 60% on computer peripherals, printers, and UPS, treating them as integral parts of the computer system. The Tribunal agreed with this decision, referencing judicial precedents that support the classification of these items as part of the computer system, thus dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

3. Writing Off of Advances and Reimbursable Amounts:
- Assessment Year 2008-09 (I.T.A.No. 2584/Del/2012): The CIT(A) allowed the write-off of Rs. 16,60,818/- as bad debts, which included fees and reimbursable expenses. The Tribunal upheld this decision, relying on the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in TRF Limited Vs CIT, which states that it is sufficient if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. Thus, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

4. Disallowance under Section 14A:
- Assessment Year 2009-10 (I.T.A.No. 4563/Del/2012): The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 31,23,402/- under Section 14A. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) did not consider the assessee's argument regarding the nature of investments, which included group companies and debt-related mutual funds. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate the issue, considering the nature of investments and the expenditure involved, thus allowing the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.
- Assessment Year 2009-10 (I.T.A.No. 4706/Del/2012): The Revenue's appeal against the partial relief of Rs. 75,450/- given by the CIT(A) was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance under Section 14A, taking into account the assessee's submissions.

Conclusion:
- The Department's appeal in I.T.A.No. 2584/Del/2012 is dismissed.
- The Department's appeal in I.T.A.No. 4706/Del/2012 is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
- The assessee's appeal in I.T.A.No. 1672/Del/2012 is allowed.
- The assessee's appeal in I.T.A.No. 4563/Del/2012 is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order Pronounced:
- The order was pronounced in the open court on 07th July, 2014.

---