Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduct the provision made for retrenchment compensation under section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as an ascertained liability in the relevant accounting year.
Analysis: Section 25FF applies only where, on transfer of an undertaking, the workmen's service is interrupted or the transferee is not under the statutory obligation contemplated by the proviso. On the facts, the agreement provided that the employees' services would continue uninterrupted, their service conditions would not become less favourable, and the transferee-company would be liable to pay compensation in the event of retrenchment on the basis of continuous service. The liability, therefore, did not accrue to the assessee on the transfer date. The assessee's claimed provision was not a liability payable by it and could not be treated as an allowable deduction merely because it had been entered in the books.
Conclusion: The deduction was not allowable and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the proviso to section 25FF is satisfied on transfer of an undertaking, no retrenchment-compensation liability accrues to the transferor, and a book provision made for such compensation is not a deductible ascertained liability.