Charge-sheet cannot be refused for want of custody; summons should usually follow, with arrest and warrants only for recorded necessity.

A criminal court cannot return or refuse a charge-sheet merely because the accused was not arrested during investigation or not forwarded in custody. The scheme of Sections 170 and 173 CrPC requires acceptance of the police report, with the court then deciding whether to take cognizance, order further investigation, or otherwise proceed according to law. When a charge-sheet is filed without arrest, summons should ordinarily issue; warrants require recorded reasons such as absconding, refusal to appear, or other sufficient cause. Bail must be considered on settled principles, with personal liberty remaining paramount and oppressive conditions avoided.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a criminal court can refuse to accept a charge-sheet solely because the accused was not arrested during investigation or not produced in custody at the time of filing of the police report; (ii) what are the proper consequences for arrest, summons, warrant, and bail when a charge-sheet is filed without arrest of the accused.

Issue (i): Whether a criminal court can refuse to accept a charge-sheet solely because the accused was not arrested during investigation or not produced in custody at the time of filing of the police report.

Analysis: On a reading of the scheme of Sections 170 and 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the forwarding of the accused in custody is not an invariable precondition for filing or acceptance of the police report. Section 173 requires the police to forward the report and specify, inter alia, whether the accused has been arrested or forwarded in custody; it does not authorize the court to return the charge-sheet for want of custody. The court's options upon receipt of the report are confined to accepting the report and taking cognizance, disagreeing and dropping the proceedings, or directing further investigation. The word "custody" in Section 170 is understood as presentation before the court where necessary, not as an absolute mandate of arrest in every cognizable and non-bailable offence. Arrest is justified by necessity for investigation, custodial interrogation, recovery, or to prevent absconding, not merely because arrest is legally possible.

Conclusion: The charge-sheet cannot be refused merely because the accused was not arrested or not produced in custody; the court must accept the police report and proceed in accordance with law.

Issue (ii): What are the proper consequences for arrest, summons, warrant, and bail when a charge-sheet is filed without arrest of the accused.

Analysis: When the police files a charge-sheet without arresting the accused, the criminal court should ordinarily issue summons and not a warrant of arrest. A warrant can be issued only for recorded reasons showing absconding, refusal to obey summons, or other legally sufficient cause. Where the accused appears in a bailable offence, release on bond follows as a matter of course. Where the accused appears in a non-bailable offence and was neither arrested during investigation nor forwarded in custody, the circumstance itself is a strong ground in favour of bail, subject to the ordinary principles governing grant or refusal of bail. The judgment reiterates that liberty is paramount, arrest is different from the power to arrest, and excessive bail conditions cannot be used to deny bail in substance. The subordinate courts are bound by the law declared by the High Court and the Supreme Court.

Conclusion: The court should accept the charge-sheet, issue summons in the ordinary course, consider bail on settled principles, and avoid mechanical arrest or oppressive conditions.

Final Conclusion: The suo motu proceedings resulted in binding directions that restrained routine arrests, prohibited rejection of charge-sheets for want of custody, and required criminal courts to follow the settled procedure while balancing investigation needs with personal liberty.

Ratio Decidendi: A criminal court has no power to return or refuse a police report merely because the accused was not arrested during investigation or not forwarded in custody; the statutory scheme requires acceptance of the charge-sheet and thereafter a lawful exercise of options under the Code, with arrest and warrants being permissible only where necessity is demonstrated and reasons are recorded.

---