Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees of a sick public sector undertaking have a legal right to claim revision of pay scales and interim relief, and to compel the Government to meet the additional wage burden despite the company's continuing losses and failed revival efforts.
Analysis: The Court held that employees of government companies are not Government servants and cannot claim, as of right, that the Government must bear their salary or the additional burden arising from pay revision. It treated the employer's economic viability and financial capacity as material and controlling considerations in wage fixation. The record showed that the undertaking had been declared a sick industrial company, that revival efforts under the statutory rehabilitation process had failed, that production had stopped in major units, and that the company was deeply loss-making. In that background, the Court held that the earlier directions concerning pay revision did not compel revision where the unit could not be revived and where the employees had also opted for voluntary retirement.
Conclusion: The claim for pay revision and interim relief was rejected, and no enforceable legal right was found in favour of the employees to compel the Government or the company to grant the requested monetary benefits.
Ratio Decidendi: Employees of a sick public sector undertaking have no enforceable right to demand pay revision or Government-funded salary enhancement where the employer lacks financial capacity and revival of the unit has failed; economic viability is a relevant and determinative factor in wage fixation.