Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commission paid to the managers under the agreements was a reasonable and deductible expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The commission formed part of the managers' remuneration and had to be judged by the statutory test of reasonableness, not by a purely subjective view of the revenue authorities. The relevant inquiry was whether the payment was commercially expedient from the standpoint of a normal prudent businessman, having regard to the pay of the employees, the conditions of service, the profits of the business, and the general practice in similar businesses. Linking a manager's remuneration to net profits could operate as a proper business incentive and was not rendered unreasonable merely because the managers' duties continued to be managerial or because the amount was calculated as a percentage of profits. The Tribunal had focused on the absence of comparable practice and on the fact that no commission was permissible at all, rather than applying the correct commercial expediency standard.
Conclusion: The commission was a reasonable expenditure and was allowable as a deduction; the question referred was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining whether commission paid to an employee is reasonable and deductible, the decisive test is commercial expediency judged from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, with reference to the statutory factors, and not a subjective assessment by the taxing authority.