Assessment order invalid due to late notice: Tribunal dismisses appeal. (2) The Tribunal held that the assessment order under Section 143(3) for Assessment Year 2006-07 was invalid as the notice under Section 143(2) was not served ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessment order invalid due to late notice: Tribunal dismisses appeal. (2)
The Tribunal held that the assessment order under Section 143(3) for Assessment Year 2006-07 was invalid as the notice under Section 143(2) was not served within the prescribed time limit. Despite the Revenue's arguments and invoking Section 292BB for protection, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) noted the appellant's address change notification and request for a new PAN. As the notice was sent to the old address beyond the time limit, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal without costs, deeming the question of law not to raise any substantial issue.
Issues: Challenge to order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding Assessment Year 2006-07 based on validity of assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The appeal challenges the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) dated 19th January, 2015, concerning the Assessment Year 2006-07. The main issue raised is whether the assessment order under Section 143(3) is valid when the notice under Section 143(2) was not served within the specified period. The Tribunal held that the assessment order dated 24th December, 2012, is invalid as the notice under Section 143(2) was not served within the prescribed time limit.
The respondent Assessee had provided a new address in its return of income for Assessment Year 2006-07. However, the Assessing Officer served the notice under Section 143(2) at the address in the PAN record, not the one in the return. The notice sent to the PAN address was not received by the respondent as it was no longer their address. Subsequently, the notice was served beyond the prescribed time limit. The respondent raised objections during the assessment proceedings, but the Assessing Officer proceeded to pass the order under Section 143(3) disregarding the objections.
The Revenue argued that they sent the notice to the address in the PAN records, which they considered correct. They also cited the respondent's participation in the assessment proceedings and invoked Section 292BB of the Act for protection. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) noted that the appellant had previously informed the Assessing Officer of the address change and requested a new PAN. The assessment order for a previous year was correctly served at the new address before the notices sent to the old address. The Tribunal rightly held that the notice not served within the specified time cannot be deemed valid under Section 292BB of the Act.
Consequently, the proposed question of law was deemed not to raise any substantial issue, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.