TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court grants IPS Officer permission for foreign travel despite pending inquiries</h1> <h3>Satish Chandra Verma IPS Versus Union Of India</h3> Satish Chandra Verma IPS Versus Union Of India - TMI Issues:Challenge to denial of permission for a private foreign visit due to lack of vigilance clearance.Analysis:The appellant, an IPS Officer, filed O.A. No.1662 of 2018 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, contesting the denial of permission for a private foreign visit from 23.12.2018 to 19.01.2019. He clarified that he was not involved in any criminal case, although departmental inquiries were pending against him, which he had challenged in the Tribunal. The Tribunal and the High Court had both refused to grant the interim relief sought by the appellant, citing lack of vigilance clearance as the reason for denial of permission.The appellant contended that the denial of permission infringed upon his fundamental right to travel. The Supreme Court acknowledged the significance of the right to travel abroad as a fundamental human right, emphasizing its role in fostering individual growth and experiences. Referring to previous judgments, the Court highlighted the social value and importance of the freedom to go abroad. Despite the pending departmental proceedings, the Court held that such proceedings should not serve as a barrier to the appellant's travel plans.Upon hearing arguments from the appellant's counsel and the Additional Solicitor General, the Court requested clarification from the Government of India regarding any criminal involvement or objections to the appellant's travel. After considering the appellant's paid leave and previous travel permissions granted by the Court, it was concluded that there was no valid reason for the Government to refuse permission for the upcoming trip to the U.S.A. and France. The Court directed the respondents to allow the appellant to travel during the specified period, with the condition that he provide an undertaking to return by a specified date.In conclusion, the Civil Appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, granting him permission to travel abroad based on the fundamental right to travel and the absence of valid reasons for refusal by the Government of India.
TaxTMI 