Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee-trust was entitled to exemption under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, notwithstanding clauses in the trust deeds empowering the trustees to advance commerce and industry, to manage allied institutions, and to accept donations on terms and conditions.
Analysis: The expression "charitable purpose" in section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, includes advancement of any other object of general public utility, and advancement of commerce and industry falls within that category. The trust deeds had a predominantly charitable character, and clauses 12 and 13 could not be read in isolation. Those clauses had to be construed along with the other provisions of the deeds and in the light of the dominant charitable objects set out in clause 5. The power to take over allied institutions was confined to institutions having objects similar to or consistent with the trust objects, and the power to accept donations or contributions was not an authority to accept them for purposes inconsistent with the trust. The donations were accretions to the trust fund and remained stamped with the trust's charitable objects. There was no material to show that the corpus or income had in fact been applied to non-charitable purposes during the relevant years.
Conclusion: The assessee-trust retained its charitable character and was entitled to exemption under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Ratio Decidendi: A trust deed must be construed as a whole, and discretionary powers to manage allied institutions or accept donations do not destroy charitable status when those powers are confined, expressly or by necessary implication, to objects consistent with the dominant charitable purposes of the trust.