Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Joint authorship of 'India Wins Freedom' confirmed; agreement valid; injunction lifted for book publication.</h1> <h3>Najma Heptulla Versus Orient Longman Ltd. And Ors.</h3> The court determined that Maulana Azad and Prof. Humayun Kabir were joint authors of the book 'India Wins Freedom.' The agreement dated 2nd September, ... - Issues Involved:1. Author of the Book 'India Wins Freedom'2. Validity of the Agreement Dated 2nd September, 19583. Authority of Prof. Humayun Kabir to Execute the Agreement4. Rights of the Legal Representatives of Maulana Azad5. Application of Promissory and Equitable Estoppel6. Interim Injunction and Balance of ConvenienceDetailed Analysis:1. Author of the Book 'India Wins Freedom':The primary issue was determining the true author of 'India Wins Freedom.' According to the plaintiff, Maulana Azad wrote the book, with Prof. Humayun Kabir assisting in its composition. Defendant No. 6, however, contended that Prof. Kabir was the sole author. The court examined the preface written by Prof. Kabir and concluded that there was active and close intellectual collaboration between Maulana Azad and Prof. Kabir. The court stated, 'Both of them actively and intellectually collaborated in the compositions of the literary work.' Thus, Maulana Azad and Prof. Kabir were regarded as joint authors.2. Validity of the Agreement Dated 2nd September, 1958:The plaintiff argued that Prof. Kabir had no authority to enter into the agreement with Orient Longmans. The court noted that the agreement was signed by Prof. Kabir, who was stated to be the composer of the book. The agreement provided for the publication of the book and the distribution of royalties. The court held that the agreement was valid, stating, 'Having enjoyed the fruits of the said agreement for all these years the legal representatives of Maulana Azad are estopped from challenging the validity of the said agreement.'3. Authority of Prof. Humayun Kabir to Execute the Agreement:The court examined whether Prof. Kabir had the authority to execute the agreement. It was noted that Fatima Begum, a legal representative of Maulana Azad, had signed a document on 29th May, 1958, agreeing to the arrangement made by Prof. Kabir with Orient Longmans. The court concluded that this action ratified Prof. Kabir's authority, stating, 'The action of Prof. Kabir was ratified by Fatima Begum.'4. Rights of the Legal Representatives of Maulana Azad:The plaintiff claimed that the legal heirs of Maulana Azad had the exclusive right to decide upon the publication of the complete book. The court noted that Fatima Begum and Nooruddin Ahmed, the legal heirs, had received royalties under the agreement. The court held that the legal representatives had acquiesced to the arrangement for nearly 30 years and were estopped from challenging it now.5. Application of Promissory and Equitable Estoppel:The court applied the principles of promissory and equitable estoppel, noting that the legal representatives had accepted royalties for nearly 30 years without objection. The court stated, 'Having acquiesced to this arrangement, it is now too late for the legal representatives of Fatima Begum to undo the wishes of the author, Maulana Azad.'6. Interim Injunction and Balance of Convenience:The plaintiff sought an interim injunction to restrain the defendants from breaking the seals of the covers of the complete book. The court vacated the ad interim injunction, stating, 'The balance of convenience is against the plaintiff and no injunction should be granted.' The court noted that the plaintiff's rights could be adequately secured by putting defendant No. 1 to terms, requiring them to give security before publishing the complete book.Conclusion:The court concluded that Maulana Azad and Prof. Humayun Kabir were joint authors of 'India Wins Freedom.' The agreement dated 2nd September, 1958, was valid, and Prof. Kabir had the authority to execute it. The legal representatives of Maulana Azad were estopped from challenging the agreement due to their long-term acquiescence. The interim injunction was vacated, allowing the defendants to publish the complete book upon providing security.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found