Unequal partition and debt relinquishment treated as a gift under estate duty law, with value includible in the estate.

A coparcener's relinquishment of a substantially larger debt at partition, when tied to adjustment of both assets and liabilities in a single transaction, was treated as part of the partition arrangement rather than a separate act. Because partition requires equal division of assets and liabilities, a party giving up a larger claim so the other receives a larger benefit creates an unequal partition. Where such unequal division is carried out pursuant to an understanding between the parties, it is treated as a disposition amounting to a gift under the Estate Duty Act, and the corresponding value is includible in the principal value of the estate.

---

---

Issues: Whether the relinquishment of a larger debt by one coparcener at the time of partition constituted a disposition amounting to a gift liable to be included in the principal value of the estate.

Analysis: The deceased and his brother divided the father's estate by one transaction in which both the assets and the outstanding debts were adjusted. The finding was that the deceased relinquished a substantially larger debt than his brother, and the relinquishment could not be dissociated from the partition. In a partition, assets and liabilities must be divided equally, and where one party gives up a larger claim so that the other receives a larger benefit, the arrangement amounts to an unequal partition. Such unequal partition, effected in pursuance of an understanding between the parties, is treated as a disposition and as a gift under the Estate Duty Act.

Conclusion: The relinquishment was a disposition amounting to a gift, and the corresponding amount was includible in the principal value of the estate.

---